SPN report
Oct. 9th, 2013 10:31There were some things I really liked about this episode, and some things that pissed me off so much I had a hard time getting to sleep last night. (Or maybe that was because I cracked my head on the kitchen cabinet while doing the dishes, IDK.) Of course, about an hour before the show started, I read that Jared said this was going to be the best season yet, and I thought, "Oh, no."
The Good:
I like the peeks we get into Sam's head. It's the third time now, and I like that it always involves a forest. What I most adored about this journey was that before he realized that the conversation with Dean was all in his head, he knew that Dean was working on a way to save him. Sam's subconscious completely trusts Dean. And also, Dean gives Sam a reason to live. I thought the scenes in Sam's head showed us a really good understanding of the relationship between the brothers from Sam's POV. I don't think we should be surprised that Sam was willing to die, though; remember his "So?" when Dean told him the Trials were going to kill him? He was ready, whether as a result of the exertion of the Trials or because, like Dean way back in "Croatoan," he was just so tired.
The scene with Death blew me away. When Death said it was an honor to collect Sam's soul, I honestly made little squeeing noises. And then he said it was Sam's choice. Dean didn't have a choice in IMTOD, not like this. But Death said, "Well-played." Death respects Sam Winchester. How freakin' amazing is that? And then Sam's request that he stay dead so that no one else (Dean) can get hurt because of him...that just broke my heart. Oh, Sam.
The Bad:
I know that being the first ep of the season, there's a lot of setting up involved, so I'm trying not to judge the angel storyline yet. What I will judge, though, is the abrupt cutting back and forth between storylines in the second half, especially as Dean was trying to make his decision. Maybe it's just that I'm more invested in Sam-n-Dean than Castiel, but it was driving me nuts. I also hope Cas meets up with the boys again soon; I don't mind him interacting with them, but I'm just not that interested in him out there on his own. (Entitled!Z is entitled.)
Also, so not happy with yet another season of Sam-who's-not-really-Sam. I do enjoy watching Jared act out different variations of Sam, but it really would have been nice for once to open the season with Sam, fully intact and whole with no doubt that he's himself. (See Seasons 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.)
The Ugly:
Dean. Dean, Dean, Dean. There's erotic co-dependency, and then there's you. If the scenes in Sam's head showed us how well the writers understand the boys' relationship, how Sam has grown enough after everything to be able to let go, the scenes with Dean showed us that absolutely nothing has changed for him since S2. He knows what kind of bad stuff can happen when he can't let go of Sam, including but not limited to the apocalypse. He knows that Sam made his decision, made his peace with Death. He knows that Sam doesn't want to be possessed by an angel. He knows all of these things, and he doesn't care, because what he wants is more important. So there might not be a Dean without a Sam, but what kind of a Dean is there if he's willing to do things to Sam that he knows Sam doesn't want?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 14:47 (UTC)I legit LOLed at the parentheses :D
There is a small (okay fairly large) part of me that loves Dean's codependency with Sam - to always have his brother and to always save him (he obvs loves the hero role) - but I just kljsadfkljlskdjf . Sigh. After a while I just kept thinking 'okay, let's go, bring Sam back already!' I mean, it's the season 9 opener, we KNOW he's going to live, and I almost didn't care how it came to be. But then it happened and ... I don't even know. What's worse than jumping a shark?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 15:55 (UTC)I know what you mean. I've always loved that about their relationship. But IDK, it started to bother me at the end of last season. After all they'd gone through, all of the people they'd lost to get to that point, to be so close to closing the gates of Hell, which would have a huge impact on the world, when Dean finds out Sam's life is the price, he's like, "Uh-uh, no way, can't have that. Demons, have at the world all you want." And now this is just going too far. :(
no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 15:00 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 15:58 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 16:21 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 03:19 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 18:34 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 03:20 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 18:46 (UTC)*is entitled right along with you* And I fully admit that I'm MUCH more invested in Sam-n-Dean than I am in Castiel. I hope he survives his little adventure, but his story takes the back seat (in the car five car-lengths behind) to Sam and Dean's story.
Dean's actions . . . are less than commendable, it is true. But (a), he's hard-wired to "save Sammy," and (b) grieving people don't always do what's "right."
no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 03:24 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 04:02 (UTC)But we're cool. :)
no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 18:44 (UTC)Just have to drop in to say I like both your comments. It may be sort of a fanwank to insert inner dialogue into an episode that isn't actually there in the script, but I imagine two things when I think about Dean's action. (In addition to your great new observations: Dean's hard-wiring and grief.
1. In my mind (not in the script), Dean is telling Sammy - you said there was a light at the end of the tunnel, and you'd take me to it. This isn't that light. You said you'd show me that life is worth living; I need you to stick around and keep that promise.
2. If Sam ever did complete a health care proxy (and I don't see how he could, when they're unlikely to be facing medical end-of-life decisions under their own names), but if he did, I can imagine him filling out a form that lists extreme measures that can be taken, and at the end of the form, it would say something like: for anything not covered above, is there someone you trust completely to make decisions on your behalf on extreme measures to keep you alive if you are in a coma?
I think Sam would have put Dean's name, and signed it. Not that he did, or that Dean would necessarily know if he did, but in terms of consent issues, this lingers in the back of my mind.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 23:50 (UTC)I can imagine him filling out a form that lists extreme measures that can be taken, and at the end of the form, it would say something like: for anything not covered above, is there someone you trust completely to make decisions on your behalf on extreme measures to keep you alive if you are in a coma?
I think Sam would have put Dean's name, and signed it.
I imagine he would have, too. (He would've done such a thing in a much better frame-of-mind than he was at the end of 8.23, also.)
no subject
Date: 2013-10-12 14:40 (UTC)In the end, I'm annoyed at the writers for contriving this situation where Dean had to trick Sam into being possessed by an angel. There were so many other ways to go from the end of last season, and that they set up this episode specifically to have that outcome annoys me. I just want to start a season with Sam as Sam for once. *cuddles him*
no subject
Date: 2013-10-12 14:36 (UTC)I am interested in seeing how things play out now, both on the show and in fandom...
no subject
Date: 2013-10-09 23:42 (UTC)(See Seasons 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8.) But what of Season 3, since the YED said at the end of AHBL 2 that Dean couldn't be sure that what he brought back was "100% pure Sam?" Crap, have we EVER seen the real Sam?!
Yes, Dean's move was selfish and desperate, but frankly I didn't expect anything else. Don't get me wrong, I fucking love Dean, and his Sam-shaped blind spot is the character flaw that's most compelling about him. I'm just remembering that for all his S3 fears about going to Hell, and all his S4 agony about what was done to him there, he never once expressed regret about making that deal. He was never truly sorry he saved Sam that way. Anyone who can hold onto that mindset after 40 years of Hell torture ain't gonna change, ever. I'm not defending him (well, maybe), I'm just saying I wasn't surprised.
no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 03:28 (UTC)Maybe I meant 3 and not 2, because that's the line I was thinking of. But no, there was more concern that there was something wrong with Sam in S2 than in S3, right?
I guess what surprises me now is that he ever let Sam jump into the pit. Was he just too beat up to lunge out and hold him back the way Michael tried to?
no subject
Date: 2013-10-10 15:46 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-11 17:31 (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-10-12 14:36 (UTC)